Gt strudl vs staad

gt strudl vs staad

It is trusted and used globally by thousands of engineers to deliver accurate results, quickly and efficiently. The software has a proven track record in a variety of applications such as: nuclear and conventional power generation, on- and off-shore facilities, marine, civil and infrastructure, and others.

GT STRUDL is capable of supplying engineers with accurate and complete technical data for efficient and engineering and design decision making. GT STRUDL is a fully integrated and database driven software system for general finite element analysis and comprehensive structural engineering design. GT STRUDL has nine functional areas that operate seamlessly with one another, and combined with amazingly fast computational speed, provides virtually unlimited power and flexibility for projects of any size or complexity.

The linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis capabilities of GT STRUDL are respected globally and few programs possess its depth and breadth of functionality. GT STRUDL includes all the tools necessary to analyze a broad range of structural projects, from the simplest, to the most complex, and can do so accurately and reliably in a fraction of the time of many other solutions. These details are extensively documented, enabling the engineer to review the details of its code checking procedures.

This control enables engineers to deliver optimal designs in the most cost effective manner. Complex steel Base Plate modeling, linear and nonlinear analysis, and performance evaluations can be performed using an easy-to-use and full featured graphical interface. Users can model base plate criteria including holes, notches, and tabs, anchors, attachments, stiffeners, bearing surface data and boundary conditions representing shear lugs, and edge welds etc. With special member, floor slab and wall panel automatic generation capabilities, even complex reinforced concrete building structures are easily modeled.

A great deal of engineering time can be saved with this capability. GT STRUDL provides the ability to analyze and model environmental loadings such as wind loads, cyclic wave loads, current loads, buoyancy loads, launching and lifting loads, and seismic loads that are applied to offshore structures such as fixed jacket structures, cable stayed and tension-leg semi-submersible structures, and other rigid floating structures.

Both linear and nonlinear analysis, jacket launch, stability and upending analysis, fatigue checking using Power Spectral Density, Discreet Probability, and Deterministic methods, stress concentration factor calculations, nonlinear pile-structure interaction analysis, and code checking by the ISO E and API RP 2A-WSD 21st Edition can be performed.

Click here to download the product sheet. Feature-rich Integration GT STRUDL is a fully integrated and database driven software system for general finite element analysis and comprehensive structural engineering design.

Analysis The linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis capabilities of GT STRUDL are respected globally and few programs possess its depth and breadth of functionality.

Base Plate Wizard Complex steel Base Plate modeling, linear and nonlinear analysis, and performance evaluations can be performed using an easy-to-use and full featured graphical interface. Offshore Jacket and Pile Analysis GT STRUDL provides the ability to analyze and model environmental loadings such as wind loads, cyclic wave loads, current loads, buoyancy loads, launching and lifting loads, and seismic loads that are applied to offshore structures such as fixed jacket structures, cable stayed and tension-leg semi-submersible structures, and other rigid floating structures.Dear Colleagues: I have a dilemma which prevents me from sleeping at night: I'm in charge of purchasing a software Intergraph compatible Frameworks and which is also a good 'stand alone' FEM program.

As far as I know the choice is only restricted to Gt Strudl and Staad. The platform we are now using is Windows NT. As a former Ansys user I have tried this Gt Strudl, and I think it has still a lot of catching up to do. This especially concerns the latest and only Windows NT Beta version: it is only formally graphic, but when it comes to the model generation one still has to work as my "dad" used to: oldy input files, with excessively long typed commands.

Meshing macro-areas is then another headache: still far away from the "solid model" concept of, as for e. What I really need to know is weather Staad encounters the same problems. Are their users satisfied, are Gt Strudl users satisfied? I would really appreciate sincere answers.

I think the Internet should be used as largely as possible for this purpose, I'm fed up of this feeling of being an unarmed consumer.

CR: Reference Files in STAAD.Pro CE

Hear from You. I had to write an introductory users manual for GT Strudl in 89 my last exposure to it and used STAAD in a graduate design course two years ago - so I don't know if I am making a fair comparison - GT Strudl may have undergone a dramatic face lift in the interim. But, my impressions are that GT Strudl had very arcane commands, not intuitive at all. GT Strudl started in the late 70s I believe and showed signs of age.

As old software gets new features added that weren't part of the original design, it begins to develop a patchwork feel to it and GT Strudl definately had that feel. Staad has a nice, clean interface and I was running simple steel frame models within a few hours of loading the package.

For what its worth, I relied mainly on Ansys for more complicated geometries, load conditions or time dependant analysis. Still looking for a job come May - any takers? My experience has been that it was purely used as an acedemic research tool. Honestly, I'm actually surprised to see you mention it, my impression was that Strudl died a while ago. If you want, I'll try to find the address again.

Most of the discussion centered around bug reports but there are several people on the list that can answer your most detailed questions about STAAD. Close to every day, I ran the dynamic seismic and wind and static portions for the analysis of existing bridges in the Phase 2 portion of Calif. DOT's Seismic Retrofit program. I also used it to determine the design loading for a new bridge retrofit by replacement. I was really disappointed with the problems this program had. The work arounds included running various models to try to represent the tension-compression characteristics of the bridge hinge and seat abutments.

Another major problem with GTStrudl was in the inability to yield correct distribution of gravity loading across a multi-column bent or pier. I was using the "latest-greatest" version can't remember the version. Wed, 15 Sep GMT dvrineh. STAAD will allow members to be tension-only or compression-onlyRegister now or log in to join your professional community. This is a tricky question without a real answer for several reasons, but the main one is that an structural problem never have only a single solution, but zillions of solutions that comply with three basic requests for a valid solution.

The best solution for the developer the cheapest structure that met the country codes, maybe is not the best solution for the calculist the one who take less effort or timeand of course, the matter is also different for the contractor the one that maximize their profit. Staad, Etabs or Sap, etc.

For Telecomm. Products By Bayt. Use Our Mobile App. Get Fresh Updates On your job applications, and stay connected. Download Now. Start networking and exchanging professional insights Register now or log in to join your professional community.

Follow What is the best structural analysis software? Structural Analysis. Upvote 2 Views Followers 5. Write an Answer Register now or log in to answer. Upvote 3 Downvote 0 Reply 0. For different type of analysis different type of analysis softwares available. Answer added by Deleted user 5 years ago. Upvote 2 Downvote 0 Reply 0. Upvote 1 Downvote 0 Reply 0. Upvote 0 Downvote 0 Reply 0.Register now or log in to join your professional community. Sometimes client are asking a manual calculations.

Hi Can you please help me with a reference or resources to make a calculation note for aluminum design especially curtain wall. Depends on the type of structure we are going for. Hydro projects go with SAP. So its a kind of a mix for me. RFEM has been my choice for the past year. WAY more intuitive to both model and understand your results compared to several other programs I've used in the past. The most software used are STAAD Pro and Robot Structural Analysis but still that the use of software depends on the design office preference and the region of the project.

Depends on the part you want to design and analyse STAAD needs more skills Etabs is easy for high rise symetrical structures and frames for foundation staad is nod good but all these softwares are based on one concept i. Products By Bayt. Use Our Mobile App.

gt strudl vs staad

Get Fresh Updates On your job applications, and stay connected. Download Now. Start networking and exchanging professional insights Register now or log in to join your professional community. Follow In today's world, which one is the best Structural Design and Analysis Software we use most frequently for big constructions? Upvote 3 Views Followers Write an Answer Register now or log in to answer. Upvote 1 Downvote 0 Reply 0. Answer added by Mahantesh Sweety 2 years ago.

Upvote 0 Downvote 0 Reply 0. Answer added by Saswajeet Routray, Asst. Answer added by Stephan Helford 3 years ago.

GT STRUDL Structural Modeling, Analysis & Design

See More Answers.Log In. He'll help you. COM vertion 5. Where you can work with vertical,horizaontal and oblique elements all together.

I am sure that is the best of the best. It is a general analysis and design FEA. The software has been improved and in use for over 10 years. It is especially good for concrete detailing of beams and columns.

Can you share your view on that software? I agree that the people who makes a living writing software. I think they claim "our program does it all" Because many grand-father clause engineers partners of firms believe them I was working as a Sr Structural Engineer in bridge design, and then company was running low of work. STAAD assumed one I included those comments in my review I was laid off I guess STAAD works fine for the partners of the firm, who only want to see the results, and don't care if the results are correct Computer analysis is a tool for speeding up the design process and justifying the engineers 'assumptions and conclusions'.

I once worked with a junior engineer who made a very slight error of input into an analysis package. He was perplexed when a joint deflection was stated as 4km and he asked me if I thought this was correct for the type of structure! If your lay-off was recent, then please accept our sympathies.

Whenever it occurred, I would suggest that, in the long term, you must be better off having escaped from a firm with such a mindset at the top. The issue you mention of not knowing the member orientation is common to many packages.

In fact, I have not seen a good solution to the problem. The best solution I have found is to use a member "rendering" function where you can actually see the real shape of the member rather than just its centerline.

Debugging a model for that kind of small thing is a whole skill in itself. For example, when I am debugging I like to look at the mode shapes even if I am doing a static or time history analysis. You might think of it as a step up from the old technique of looking at deflected shapes. If the mode shapes look about right, you know you have gotten your stiffnesses and geometry approximately correct.

Software developers need to make more user friendly interfaces so that you make less mistakes in the first place, and also to provide more debugging tools. Often you spend more time debugging a model than you spend building it.I'm a civil engineering student and I would like to know which of the two should I set more focus on.

You should focus first on learning the things you're being taught in the classroom. Then focus on the things your supervisors want you to learn during summer internships. If that somehow leaves you time to work on learning other things AutoCAD is a drafting program, used for technical drawing. It is useful to have an understanding of how it works, you may use it some as an engineer, but most design firms have draftsmen who do the bulk of their technical drawing under the direction of the engineers.

I work in bridge design, and I make only minor edits to drawings, if substantial work needs done I mark up a copy of what I need and give it to the CAD guys. I do use drafting software sometimes to obtain measurements and properties of shapes that are harder to calculate, just because it is sometimes faster to sketch things than to do the math. You can learn everything you need for using CAD programs in a couple of days.

gt strudl vs staad

AutoCAD and Microstation are the two most common. Pro is a structural analysis and design program. You use it to actually model and design things like bridges and buildings - obtaining forces and displacements and such. If you specialize in structures as a civil engineer, you will need to become familiar with how some analysis program works, you will probably use quite a variety of them during your career.

There are also a variety of programs for specialized designs, such as Florida-Pier for substructures, MDX for steel girders, etc. There isn't much benefit to trying to learn these programs on your own, because different companies prefer different ones, and if you learn the basics you can adapt to any of them with just a little practice.

Do summer internships, and when you get a job later on you'll be able to learn the software that is specific to your employer. It is more important for you right now to learn the things going on in the background of those programs, to understand the answers that the software gives you so that you can effectively use it and interpret it.

If you are interested in structures, and the opportunity for a computer analysis class exists within your schedule, take it.

Understanding how the programs analyze and design things will save you a huge amount of time someday, when a program doesn't want to run or gives you nonsense it will be a ton easier for you to diagnose the problem with the input.

Should I first learn autocad before trying staad? Could you give me some advise? Answer Save.A comprehensive building information modeling BIM solution for the design and documentation of structural systems. With an intuitive user interface, extensive libraries of structural components, and powerful tools for modeling, drafting, and reporting, Structural supports all phases of the structural workflow, from the design and modeling of structural systems to structural analysis and construction documentation.

Integrating design, visualization, drawing production, and reporting, Structural is part of BIM solution of integrated design, engineering, and management applications for the entire lifecycle of constructed assets.

Used on large and complex projects around the world, Structural was specifically developed to support workgroups and distributed teams in a managed environment, allowing architects, engineers, and contractors to build as one. BIM enables business-critical benefits over traditional computer-aided drafting CADeliminates waste, significantly reduces errors and omissions, provides greater predictability of costs and performance, allows exploration of more design options, and ultimately results in better buildings.

Structural design and information modeling A comprehensive range of dedicated tools supports the design and modeling of structures in steel, concrete, and timber. Parametric components, such as walls, foundations, columns, beams, trusses, slabs, and bracings, allow dimension-driven creation and modification. Intersecting members are automatically coped or cut back from supporting members, and if necessary, rotated to the slope angle of their supports.

Choice of 2D, 3D, or both The building information model can be created and manipulated in a traditional 2D plan or an advanced 3D model environment - using the same tools and interface for either.

Integration with analysis and detailing Simultaneously with the physical members, an analytical model is created, to which boundary conditions, member releases, and various load combinations can be added.

GTSTRUDL Version 2016 (35) Element Results for a Selection

This finite element information integrates directly with leading structural analysis applications. Integration with steel detailing and concrete reinforcement software is supported via industry-standard exchange formats. Rule-based drawing production Plans, framing layouts, sections, and elevations comply with user-definable drawing standards and rules for resymbolization and annotation.

Options are provided for single- or double-line representation, removal or display of hidden lines, and extensive labeling and annotation of structural members.

Coordination and consistency is thereby ensured across all documentation. Integrated schedules and reporting User-definable properties associated with structural members can be used to query the structural information model, to make selective or global changes to the geometry and nongraphical information, and to generate accurate component schedules that include lengths, volumes, weights, centers of mass, and more.

Changes in Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, affecting attributes such as steel section size and height of single or multiple structural components, update both physical and analytical models. A managed environment Structural can be integrated with ProjectWise, a collaboration server that manages access to project information across a LAN, WAN, VPN, or through the Internet, and publishes and synchronizes shared information, manages change, protects intellectual property rights, and more.

Structural At-A-Glance. Building information modeling BIM. Parametric and feature-based structural design. Coordinated construction documentation. International and custom standards support.

gt strudl vs staad

Integration with analysis and detailing. Visual Basic for Applications. Interoperability with building design, engineering and analysis.

Integration with managed environment.


thoughts on “Gt strudl vs staad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *